Swollen Gland After Alcohol

Schrozberg goes flattr.com - can now be geflattrt

I do not want to be rich and that works best with Flattr . Therefore, wants to here as a test to try for a while. The integration of Flattr in blogger.com is described quite well, but we must forget their own njicht Flattr User ID (numeric) to replace.

I had problems with the Originalskrikt here again a modified version that takes out from the blog post content to HTML, and in which the same language is adapted to German ( Plain Text Download ):

\u0026lt;div expr: id = '" " flattr_summary_ + data: post.id' style = 'display: none;'>
\u0026lt;data:post.body/>
\u0026lt; ; / div>
\u0026lt;div expr:id='"flattr_title_" + data:post.id' style='display: none;'>
\u0026lt;data: post.title />
\u0026lt;/ div>

\u0026lt;span style='float:left; margin:5px;'>
\u0026lt;script type = 'text / javascript & # 39;>

was flattr_uid = ' _____&# 39;; / / Replace underscores with Flattr ID
was flattr_tle = document.getElementById (' flattr_title_ \u0026lt;data:post.id/> ; '). innerHTML;
var flattr_dsc = document.getElementById('flattr_summary_<data:post.id/>').innerHTML;

// strips html tags out of the description
flattr_dsc = flattr_dsc.replace(/(<([^>]+)>)/ig,'');

var flattr_cat = 'text';
var flattr_lng = 'de_DE'; // german language
var flattr_tag = '<b:if cond='data:post.labels'><b:loop values = 'data: post.labels' var =' label '> \u0026lt;data:label.name/> \u0026lt;b: if cond =' data: label . ice load! = " true "'>,\u0026lt;/ b: if> \u0026lt;/ b: loop> \u0026lt;/ b: if> ';
was flattr_url = ' ' \u0026lt;data:post.url/>;
was flattr_btn = ' '; / / for a typical button
/ / was flattr_btn = & # 39; CompactFlash '; / / for CompactFlash button


\u0026lt;/ script>
\u0026lt;script src = 'http://api.flattr.com/button/load.js' type = 'text / javascript' / >
\u0026lt;/ span>

What the flattrn I would also like:

• Tauss is in revision
• 4th The trial against Jörg Tauss
• prosecutor but politically biased? - Background information on the trial of Jörg Tauss
• Breakfast in the District Court - 3rd The trial against Jörg Tauss
  

Miniature Cannons Plans

Tauss is fourth in revision

Jörg Tauss, was today sentenced by the District Court to 15 months' imprisonment wants to appeal. "This is a verdict with which I can not live and does not like to live." so Tauss.

This is my first last blog entry on the topic. But since I live in the region of Karlsruhe, I'll be watching the review process again in person on site. I personally think Tauss still innocent (as charged) and welcome the audit. I would really like to see a job of the Federal Constitutional Court with the issue since we are dealing with fundamental issues. Namely: What MPs can do and what they must do in order to retrieve information (Article 38 GG in connection with § 184 b para 5 Criminal Code, eg: European arrest warrant, etc..). Andreas Popp, Deputy. Chairman of the Pirate Party, puts it in my opinion, to the point: "Members are therefore only government puppets "
See also: "Why is a member of research itself must ..."

Just a note Pirate Party with respect: I think as long as Jörg Tauss should remain a member, as the verdict is not yet final. In the case of a final conviction, he should, regardless of the laws and regulations, themselves to escape damage from the party to be averted. I am further behind him. The main argument for me: If he were interested in priv use what he had on the hard drives and collected material probably already for decades. Sexual orientation develop in puberty and not until his mid-fifties (sans the verdict is yes, that the court believed him even to have had no sexual interest? ). The way the courts are unfathomable. Amen.

more information on this Schrozberg:
report of 4 The trial prosecutor
politically biased?

and bruchsal.org ... (Including Verdict)

Used Expired Viamox In My Eye

The trial against Jörg Tauss

Even this morning I was at 9.00 clock in the land court for the 4th to observe the trial for the case Tauss. First, I noticed that slightly more people were sitting in the rows of seats as the third the trial. Many apparently knew what makes me think (I see no conspiracy in it!) That has been mixed here, the police and / or prosecution with the audience. For whatever purpose. This is corroborated by an incident in the previous third The trial as a "spectator" to the prosecutor in the midst of negotiating a Hollywood standard by judicial officers Label has sent. Kind of reminded me of Oliver Kahn and Jens Lehmann .

went off with questioning of a witness. The 30-year-old man was sentenced in March 2007 for possession or distribution of child pornography. He then apparently had contacts with SMS and MMS Tauss. During this period, after his conviction, the witness but only legal adult pornography exchanged. A "Werner" he knew not ("Werner" was the code name of Tauss). So for me a clear discharge, even if the witness was a bit "windy". What has shocked me, however: The witness was then probably in his testimony (that sometime before March 2007) by police and prosecutors (and where exactly by whom he has not said) "under pressure" (a statement to make?). On the day of the hearing he claims to "fever and circulatory problems." He was therefore somewhat confused. However, it is the part of the state power has not been received (refusal of medical help?). The court in Karlsruhe went today with no word on this description. Moreover, the connection data of the witnesses probably raised illegal or evaluated. noted Michael Rosenthal (one of the defender) has. Thereafter, the individual compounds were not addressed further. Strange if you ask me. And again konsequenzlos.

was followed by the two witnesses proof of evidence of Defense ( has bruchsal.org here then the details ). It's about the subpoena four new witnesses. In addition to a LKA officials, is apparently quoted in the c't about transmission modes of child pornography, probably will also Alvar Freude (co-founder AK censorship and member of the Internet Study Commission of the government) and Andy Mueller-Maguhn (Member be charged at the head of the Chaos Computer Club ). In addition, an informed person of Child Care . The prosecution holds all three claims are unfounded. The Court has retired to deliberate. The decision on the subpoenas is today at 11.45 Clock (ie in more than 2 hours) in the courtroom while the trial was suspended.

UPDATE clock 11:45
decision is taken, the applications will be rejected, who would have thought it.

UPDATE clock 15:20 (end)
second witness is the 31-year-old man seeking work in Bremerhaven, have had on the investigation into the Tauss out. Together with his lawyer, he entered the hall at 12.00 clock with a "meal". Mhh He claims to be a pedophile and is therefore also in treatment. Also currently runs a case against him. The press row was full, either because of the witness or because the expected pleas for today (that followed also, see below). This witness has DVD's and MMS 'with child pornography to "Werner" (nickname of Tauss) sent. Partly in exchange for money, partly for O2 credit for the prepaid card, but partly also to exchange material. He has at least made with the sale of DVD's enriching and personally, as He has sold more expensive than even purchased. "Werner" will have total paid between 600 and 1200 EUR. The witness said, from a variety of MMS 'and of at least 15-20 DVDs. There were traded only content with minor boys. The witness stated that a few "material" with girls possess. Apparently you get to the scene because a lot harder turn. Tauss has never asked for girls (?). Filed he has contact with Tauss in the mobile phone book under "WernerKnabenSms. Between the two there was never personal or telephone contact. I first met you in the RTL video text chat. The witness had the nickname it "Sascha4You. Then there was confusion for a handwritten note with the address of the Tauss was found at the witness. First it was said that the witness had written, but then by Tauss (?) The prosecutor asked the witness if he have any advantages offered by the authorities when he comes in the process (a particular item? Is The acoustics in the courtroom crappy real ) says. He said no.

my opinion, the prosecutor tried several times by leading questions to elicit from the witness that Tauss had offered to make contact with a "producer". It was the other way (even if the witness lied at that time and has only been played. He never had contact with a "producer / manufacturer).

pleas

First, the prosecutor (essential key points, or too long):
No doubt Tauss is expert and pioneer of the Internet; Robin Hood of the liberties under his priv use because: distribution channels in 2007 lengthens known (Cold Coffee , see here). Search piecemeal approach without Comparison group and therefore inappropriate, and he has no one said anything (although he did supposedly to be right), why did not he start of 2008 as the stop sign debate the results began to be published - death knell for the Zugangserschwernißgesetz would have been, was first denied everything and start not cooperating with investigators, and later target changed from research in detonation child porn ring, material in the private apartment (not in the office), only male children that is focused search, plus homo erotic adult literature; Article 184 b paragraph 5 shall not apply because no "Serv. obligation "such as law enforcement officers, doctors, psychologists, drug Supervisor is not like a Coke in the garage and weapons Supervisor no stinger in the cellar, and all members have equal rights (just because a media representative is no special rights) -> could therefore every Member have child pornography. For Tauss says: Not a criminal record, granting the option (albeit late), only very short video clips on the phone, in person greatly affected, both financially and reputation and reputation. Against Tauss: Long time of the crime area, has other helped to kinderponrographie an active part of the scene, amount was negligible, role model violates

sentence: 15 months imprisonment suspended (2 years probation period) + 6000 EUR monetary payment to victims and perpetrators using clubs.

Then the Defense: read here
Identifies the media prejudice as a "social enforcement". Argument is mainly out to Article 38 GG and BKA misinformation. Calls acquittal.

The pleas last amount of detail in bruchsal.org .

sentencing is tomorrow 28/05/2010 at 12.00 clock. I'm following the day today and the plea a bad feeling, I think this is bad.

addendum from me: Why could demonstrate Ursula von der Leyen child porn if all members the same? procedures within no time set.

Cannon Travel Printers

prosecutor but politically biased? - Background information on the trial of Jörg Tauss

In response to my reporting on the 3rd the trial in the trial of Jörg Tauss was me this morning by email extensive material on the background, in particular the role of the prosecutor but also the juror leaked. Part of it I want to comment and publish:

Part 1) The leak in Karlsruhe

How Jörg Rupp in his blog confirmed , the policy process plays apparently had a greater role than to believe the prosecutor us want to do. decreed it was concluded that Ms. Gabriela Büssemaker (Mayor in Ettlingen, FDP) on internal police know it, seen the rule of law, should not have have. This confirms my opinion the theory that somewhere in the prosecution of Karlsruhe (Karlsruhe or the police) a leak.

Part 2) prosecutor Dr. Stephanie Eggerer-Uhrig

Apparently, Ms. Eggerer-Uhrig, in your role as chair of the Criminal Law Commission of German Women Lawyers Association (DJB) together with the controversial child protection organization " Innocence in Danger ( we remember ) In 2007 a symposium on "Internet, phone & Co." organized ( speakers). After the change from Dortmund Karlsruhe 2008, she has given the chair. This is consistent with the then supposed to start identifying Tauss. In your time as chairman of the DJB she was already with child pornography issues involved . About the DJB, you should know that this is extremely difficulty for the access law . Moreover, the long-standing chairman of the DJB, Ursula Raue, apparently including the Gründungspräsidenti n of Innocence in Danger. Well, that fits everything together so once again really great.

And it gets better:
Mrs. Eggerer-Uhrig also has a past the Federal Ministry of Justice (BMJ), and indeed in the Office of RB 3. For insiders, it says this: "was from the file, it only hints at a rather close vote of the prosecutor with the Federal Ministry of Justice in investigating Tauss and also a personal acquaintance with the people responsible - not anymore." And because so beautiful is: The unit RB 3, the department has developed into being the (unconstitutional) retention. And we all know what Tauss says data retention.

Part 3) The case Matthias Sehling (CSU)

Huh, who? Exactly! Hr. Sehling is convicted for possession of Kinderpornopraphie and no one knows. Why? Because the media and the prosecutors do not fuss about the CSU men have made. So. Because he's just from the CSU! Slightly firmer All: here BTW: the Wikipedia entry for Mr. . Sehling has also been censored beautiful.

remarkable about the process I think could proceed as quietly justice in this case, apparently because they wanted to. Why do the opposite in the case Tauss happened - in which a professional activity so because of his parliamentary functions so obvious at first sight?

Part 4) The juror Brigitte Ochlich

One of the juror, woman Brigitte Ochlich (I even somehow too many women are there with it. Besides the judges are only women. I think the district court but has a gender problem. The need because once a male officer) apparently district council candidate of the FDP was (p. 5 +6) on the list of woman Büssemaker (see above) and FDP Chairwoman. That means well: They know each other. Hopefully it does not mean we do each other and sometimes one or another favor? I would like to not to say that women could be biased Ochlich, but it looks somehow all a bit matted. As jurors are actually selected? Hopefully, by chance? Then would be nothing more than a coincidence, all, right?

also interesting Kommenate are Lawblog , especially with the number 4 of "GXS".

UPDATE: Click here for the report of the 4th Day of negotiations

Will Suction Cups Stick To Cold Windows

Breakfast in the District Court - 3rd The trial against Jörg Tauss



I was this morning at the 3rd Hearing in district court of Karlsruhe present as a spectator at the trial of Jörg Tauss. Why? To me an idea of first to make clear that I in this case no Medium more confident and will help to Tauss (which I innocent, think in terms of a non-personal interest in the material). Here is my report:

I was just before 8.30 as clock and I have in the absence of sufficient parking spaces equal time parked in the parking zone. The hearing was to begin at 9.00 clock in the jury room. I had been wondering how I can hide my mobile phone (without me somehow ... I feel naked) as well as possible, because these devices are actually prohibited in the hall. That was unnecessary, because there was no admission control and I do not know now whether I should find this good or bad. If that is next to my phone well and like several hand grenades, can carry two tanks, four medium-sized flakes and a nuclear warhead would have (at least until the ignition) not interested. Even over my cup of hot coffee is, no one had complained (would have been unthinkable). Once in the room I had breakfast only once beautiful coffee. In front of the room, I briefly Hr. Tauss taken and "Hello, I'm Schrozberg" said. He: "Did they vorgesellt me more." Ok, I suppose as a compliment. Mr. nice. Tauss, now we have sometimes met IRL.

The hall was filled slowly with quite a mixed crowd. Other pirates were unfortunately not be seen directly. From the press were only 4 or 5 people there. No cameras, no turmoil or other casserole. The judicial officers in the hall had put on a thick gold chain. He was nice, but saw (apart from the Justice T-shirt) looks like a pimp-Proll. The atmosphere was very relaxed, sometimes even became geflachst and joking. No matter.

With a few minutes late we went shortly after 9:00 clock going. The presiding judge Udo Scholl "opened" the negotiation. With him elevated to the bench: an adjunct member (also a judge) and two Schöffinnen. From viewers' perspective, left, also increased, the prosecutor. This shows first one: The district court of Karlsruhe, at least not a gender issue. Second, why is sitting higher than the prosecutor, the accused and his two defenders? What is the most symbolize? The government is always right, or what? No matter. The highest were in any case, the audience that I was reconciled.

First, a 61-year-old witness was heard from Stuttgart. He and Tauss have known each other for 15 years. As I understand it (he was acoustically difficult to understand), he has relieved Tauss, as it confirmed talks parts, after which Tauss has repeatedly talked about the adversity of child pornography with him. He also has Tauss called the politician (whom he knew) with the largest Internet skills. Tauss lt was also the first witness Politician who, had set amid the laughter of colleagues and lack of understanding of the Bundestag, the Internet in his office deputies. # Fail

The second witness, a police officer from London, which was during the search in the Pflugstrasse it were, for the record: "On the computer of Tauss any illegal material was found this it was only on the phone and on some. DVD's. These were in the second row on a shelf (which was basically equipped but one row) and in a suitcase under the bed in the bedroom. " The official residence but had practically only this room (except kitchen and bathroom), so that the Fund "is calculated in the bedroom" it probably says nothing. Where it would otherwise have to be? In the toilet cistern?

Also interesting from my point of view is that the woman had with your statement (under oath) of wild figures thrown around the area without getting to see any documents. She had then also have to constantly correct itself. Besides, she had confused a few names, and finally actually nobody really knew who now, how many SMS and MMS with who had actually exchanged. Certain, though, that Tauss with a total of 5 persons from the scene had contact. Run against four investigations, the fifth person has died.

Tauss apparently made the find of the phones in his apartment the spontaneous remark: "These are things I've found in a car" (spirit). Does not sound very convincing, but he offered to explain this statement. It was somehow not do so. The ways of the court in mysterious ways, anyway the procedure.

Also: The police were concerned for the evaluation of the 1000 pictures software that is designed to view comparisons of up to 300.00 frames. Then the question of defense: "What have been expected to record?" I wonder to myself: "Who pays so what?"

BTW: You also said: "The police have not given the press at the time the tip with the search, that must have been the prosecutor in Karlsruhe be. "LOL.

Then a round of nasty comments in defense of the BKA, as have any figures and statistics on the distribution channels of Kinderpornopraphie, but always do so, as if they had any. Then at the end to to short 11.00 clock. will continue on Thursday. pleadings on Thu or Friday. The sentence will happen probably on Tue 1.6..

The trial itself was very factual and in between there was always Flachsereien on the "Baden vs. Schwaben - cause "(for non BaWü'ler: It's the same with Bayern and the Franks), the judge makes a good impression on me, the prosecutor I would have imagined biting ... All in all, I have the impression of a fair trial.

PS: The prosecutor in the comment by the defense that has fallen, according to crime statistics 2009 child pornography by 43%: ". We better have enough staff and poor equipment that were all we would also see (again) more" - Yes what kind of knowledge.

therefore asks the Pirate Party has long indeed better equipment and training is offered to the police what "cyber crime".

UPDATE 1: Here is a report of (not mine) 2 The trial ( More Tauss on bruchsal.org )

UPDATE 2: more background information particularly, the prosecutor and the Schöffinnen

UPDATE 3: Click here for the report of the 4th Day of negotiations

Sorority Life Delete Character

police shoot baby in self-defense

As the Mirror reports have special operations forces of the police last Wednesday morning shot dead near Regensburg a four-month-old baby in self-defense.

The child had allegedly threatened the officers with a knife and children were killed pointed out by twelve bullets in the back. The concerned police officer testified before the prosecution, she would have felt threatened by the armed baby. After the child, even after repeated requests to let the knife fall, only grinned maliciously and had the police call has not complied, the police had seen no other choice than to shoot.

The prosecutor showed understanding for the actions of the police because, after all, accept the Jungend Jüngstkriminialität and more and now police are increasingly violent attacks exposed children with knives. From the Federal Interior and Justice Ministry this afternoon were first demands to ban noisy, cutlery and the web sites that offer these utensils, lock.

to a prosecution or proceedings against the police officers it will probably not come, the spokesman for the police union. The parents and friends of the child should, however with a display and may expect long prison sentences. They failed to fulfill their supervisory duties or incited the baby to such an approach.

UPDATE: Apparently, the prosecutor has
found evidence suggestive of a connection of the baby to the international terror group al-Qaeda. Accordingly, it should have been formed south of Kunduz shortly after birth two months in an Afghan terrorist camp . The Defence Minister described suggest the deployment of German troops in the A fghanistankrieg protection as the only alternative to the German population from armed babies can.