In response to my reporting on the 3rd the trial in the trial of Jörg Tauss was me this morning by email extensive material on the background, in particular the role of the prosecutor but also the juror leaked. Part of it I want to comment and publish:
Part 1) The leak in Karlsruhe
How Jörg Rupp in his blog confirmed , the policy process plays apparently had a greater role than to believe the prosecutor us want to do. decreed it was concluded that Ms. Gabriela Büssemaker (Mayor in Ettlingen, FDP) on internal police know it, seen the rule of law, should not have have. This confirms my opinion the theory that somewhere in the prosecution of Karlsruhe (Karlsruhe or the police) a leak.
Part 2) prosecutor Dr. Stephanie Eggerer-Uhrig
Apparently, Ms. Eggerer-Uhrig, in your role as chair of the Criminal Law Commission of German Women Lawyers Association (DJB) together with the controversial child protection organization " Innocence in Danger ( we remember ) In 2007 a symposium on "Internet, phone & Co." organized ( speakers). After the change from Dortmund Karlsruhe 2008, she has given the chair. This is consistent with the then supposed to start identifying Tauss. In your time as chairman of the DJB she was already with child pornography issues involved . About the DJB, you should know that this is extremely difficulty for the access law . Moreover, the long-standing chairman of the DJB, Ursula Raue, apparently including the Gründungspräsidenti n of Innocence in Danger. Well, that fits everything together so once again really great.
And it gets better:
Mrs. Eggerer-Uhrig also has a past the Federal Ministry of Justice (BMJ), and indeed in the Office of RB 3. For insiders, it says this: "was from the file, it only hints at a rather close vote of the prosecutor with the Federal Ministry of Justice in investigating Tauss and also a personal acquaintance with the people responsible - not anymore." And because so beautiful is: The unit RB 3, the department has developed into being the (unconstitutional) retention. And we all know what Tauss says data retention.
Part 3) The case Matthias Sehling (CSU)
Huh, who? Exactly! Hr. Sehling is convicted for possession of Kinderpornopraphie and no one knows. Why? Because the media and the prosecutors do not fuss about the CSU men have made. So. Because he's just from the CSU! Slightly firmer All: here BTW: the Wikipedia entry for Mr. . Sehling has also been censored beautiful.
remarkable about the process I think could proceed as quietly justice in this case, apparently because they wanted to. Why do the opposite in the case Tauss happened - in which a professional activity so because of his parliamentary functions so obvious at first sight?
Part 4) The juror Brigitte Ochlich
One of the juror, woman Brigitte Ochlich (I even somehow too many women are there with it. Besides the judges are only women. I think the district court but has a gender problem. The need because once a male officer) apparently district council candidate of the FDP was (p. 5 +6) on the list of woman Büssemaker (see above) and FDP Chairwoman. That means well: They know each other. Hopefully it does not mean we do each other and sometimes one or another favor? I would like to not to say that women could be biased Ochlich, but it looks somehow all a bit matted. As jurors are actually selected? Hopefully, by chance? Then would be nothing more than a coincidence, all, right?
also interesting Kommenate are Lawblog , especially with the number 4 of "GXS".
UPDATE: Click here for the report of the 4th Day of negotiations
0 comments:
Post a Comment