I was this morning at the 3rd Hearing in district court of Karlsruhe present as a spectator at the trial of Jörg Tauss. Why? To me an idea of first to make clear that I in this case no Medium more confident and will help to Tauss (which I innocent, think in terms of a non-personal interest in the material). Here is my report:
I was just before 8.30 as clock and I have in the absence of sufficient parking spaces equal time parked in the parking zone. The hearing was to begin at 9.00 clock in the jury room. I had been wondering how I can hide my mobile phone (without me somehow ... I feel naked) as well as possible, because these devices are actually prohibited in the hall. That was unnecessary, because there was no admission control and I do not know now whether I should find this good or bad. If that is next to my phone well and like several hand grenades, can carry two tanks, four medium-sized flakes and a nuclear warhead would have (at least until the ignition) not interested. Even over my cup of hot coffee is, no one had complained (would have been unthinkable). Once in the room I had breakfast only once beautiful coffee. In front of the room, I briefly Hr. Tauss taken and "Hello, I'm Schrozberg" said. He: "Did they vorgesellt me more." Ok, I suppose as a compliment. Mr. nice. Tauss, now we have sometimes met IRL.
The hall was filled slowly with quite a mixed crowd. Other pirates were unfortunately not be seen directly. From the press were only 4 or 5 people there. No cameras, no turmoil or other casserole. The judicial officers in the hall had put on a thick gold chain. He was nice, but saw (apart from the Justice T-shirt) looks like a pimp-Proll. The atmosphere was very relaxed, sometimes even became geflachst and joking. No matter.
With a few minutes late we went shortly after 9:00 clock going. The presiding judge Udo Scholl "opened" the negotiation. With him elevated to the bench: an adjunct member (also a judge) and two Schöffinnen. From viewers' perspective, left, also increased, the prosecutor. This shows first one: The district court of Karlsruhe, at least not a gender issue. Second, why is sitting higher than the prosecutor, the accused and his two defenders? What is the most symbolize? The government is always right, or what? No matter. The highest were in any case, the audience that I was reconciled.
First, a 61-year-old witness was heard from Stuttgart. He and Tauss have known each other for 15 years. As I understand it (he was acoustically difficult to understand), he has relieved Tauss, as it confirmed talks parts, after which Tauss has repeatedly talked about the adversity of child pornography with him. He also has Tauss called the politician (whom he knew) with the largest Internet skills. Tauss lt was also the first witness Politician who, had set amid the laughter of colleagues and lack of understanding of the Bundestag, the Internet in his office deputies. # Fail
The second witness, a police officer from London, which was during the search in the Pflugstrasse it were, for the record: "On the computer of Tauss any illegal material was found this it was only on the phone and on some. DVD's. These were in the second row on a shelf (which was basically equipped but one row) and in a suitcase under the bed in the bedroom. " The official residence but had practically only this room (except kitchen and bathroom), so that the Fund "is calculated in the bedroom" it probably says nothing. Where it would otherwise have to be? In the toilet cistern?
Also interesting from my point of view is that the woman had with your statement (under oath) of wild figures thrown around the area without getting to see any documents. She had then also have to constantly correct itself. Besides, she had confused a few names, and finally actually nobody really knew who now, how many SMS and MMS with who had actually exchanged. Certain, though, that Tauss with a total of 5 persons from the scene had contact. Run against four investigations, the fifth person has died.
Tauss apparently made the find of the phones in his apartment the spontaneous remark: "These are things I've found in a car" (spirit). Does not sound very convincing, but he offered to explain this statement. It was somehow not do so. The ways of the court in mysterious ways, anyway the procedure.
Also: The police were concerned for the evaluation of the 1000 pictures software that is designed to view comparisons of up to 300.00 frames. Then the question of defense: "What have been expected to record?" I wonder to myself: "Who pays so what?"
BTW: You also said: "The police have not given the press at the time the tip with the search, that must have been the prosecutor in Karlsruhe be. "LOL.
Then a round of nasty comments in defense of the BKA, as have any figures and statistics on the distribution channels of Kinderpornopraphie, but always do so, as if they had any. Then at the end to to short 11.00 clock. will continue on Thursday. pleadings on Thu or Friday. The sentence will happen probably on Tue 1.6..
The trial itself was very factual and in between there was always Flachsereien on the "Baden vs. Schwaben - cause "(for non BaWü'ler: It's the same with Bayern and the Franks), the judge makes a good impression on me, the prosecutor I would have imagined biting ...
PS: The prosecutor in the comment by the defense that has fallen, according to crime statistics 2009 child pornography by 43%: ". We better have enough staff and poor equipment that were all we would also see (again) more" - Yes what kind of knowledge.
therefore asks the Pirate Party has long indeed better equipment and training is offered to the police what "cyber crime".
UPDATE 1: Here is a report of (not mine) 2 The trial ( More Tauss on bruchsal.org )
UPDATE 2: more background information particularly, the prosecutor and the Schöffinnen
UPDATE 3: Click here for the report of the 4th Day of negotiations
0 comments:
Post a Comment